42 thoughts on “Terra Luna Classic | LUNC Burn Tax Back To 1.2% Proposed

  1. <<I realized that the secret to making a million is saving for a better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 80k in stocks (with the help of my Financial Advisor of course) and made about 246k, but guess what? I put it all back and traded with her again and now I'm rounding up close to a million..>>

  2. Where’s all the utility the lower taxes were to bring? Burns bring high prices, higher prices bring more holders/excitement and more holders/excitement brings utility. Case in point Shibarium has utility lined up at the door due to almost 2 million excited holders.

  3. Hell, people are buying Volt and it's a 13% in and 13% out so people in the lunc community should be pushing for 1.2 or higher. It also would be cool if Luna Classic would come out with a widget like volt has. If you download the widget for different projects , volt burns the projects tokens

  4. No with veto is kinda weird, I don’t even think some of the scam proposals get the same treatment. 1.2% should’ve never changed. We’d be well over 1% burned

  5. This shows how clueless the lunc community is. Like a bunch of children who couldn't make up their minds, and your telling me it's a good project. Gtfo here

  6. The people have already spoken, 1.2% until the supply is burned down to 10 billion coins. They’re just trying to hold back future million/billionaires.

  7. Is this pi$$ING around with the burn tax not going to annoy Binance!
    If it's to be increased, increase it to say 0.8%
    Moving it back up to 1.2% only suggested we have no idea what we're doing!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *